Background
Outbound context, PRC policy evolution, law/compliance distinctions, and theory frames for recurring risks.
Read backgroundSource check current as of
本网站由香港城市大学法律学院王江雨教授用Codex制作,仅供个人教学研究使用。
A bilingual portal for research, teaching, and decision support: rules, cases, and practical compliance tools in one place.
The portal treats compliance not as a back-office function, but as a condition for strategy, market access, and crisis response.
Outbound context, PRC policy evolution, law/compliance distinctions, and theory frames for recurring risks.
Read backgroundRepresentative literature on outward FDI, state capitalism, international investment law, and Chinese firms abroad.
View bibliographyLaw-firm, in-house, and regulator materials for building overseas compliance systems.
Open practice listSanctions, data, labour, subsidies, investment screening, platforms, IP, tax, anti-corruption, and ESG.
Open risk mapFilter by company, jurisdiction, industry, risk type, and status for teaching and research use.
Browse casesPre-entry gates, post-entry rhythm, third-party controls, supply-chain evidence, and crisis scripts.
View playbooksThe timeline tracks rule and enforcement changes that alter corporate preparation windows.
The initial version of this site uses 26 June 2026 as the source-check date; later cases and legal developments will be maintained through structured data.
EU CBAM moves from transitional reporting into its definitive regime, requiring exporters to support importers on authorization, emissions data, and certificate-cost allocation.
The United States applies prohibition or notification rules to certain China-related semiconductor, quantum, and AI investments, affecting financing, funds, and technical cooperation.
The regulation has entered into force and will apply in 2027, giving companies a window to build traceability, labour audits, and evidence packs.
The first version covers the United States, EU, UK, Brazil, India, China, and global multilateral mechanisms; later updates can be added directly to the data files.
58 / 58
The United States framed divestiture or shutdown around national security, showing how algorithmic control, data, and ownership structures can trigger political and legal risk together.
Read caseIreland's Data Protection Commission imposed a EUR 530 million fine focused on safeguards and transparency for EEA user data accessed from or transferred to China.
Read caseThe EU DSA imposes ad transparency, risk assessment, and researcher-access duties on very large online platforms, keeping TikTok under intensive regulatory scrutiny.
Read caseThe Commission's preliminary findings on illegal product risk at Temu show that low-price SKU scale and third-party trader models require strong governance systems.
Read caseThe United States ended de minimis treatment for low-value shipments from China and Hong Kong, weakening e-commerce models built on low-value direct mail.
Read caseAs a very large online platform, Shein faces DSA duties on systemic risk, product safety, trader traceability, and consumer protection.
Read caseThe EU opened DSA proceedings into AliExpress, focusing on illegal goods, content moderation, complaint mechanisms, ad transparency, and researcher access.
Read caseItaly's data protection authority acted against DeepSeek, focusing on data collection, notices, storage location, and transfers to China.
Read caseThe EU imposed five-year countervailing duties on Chinese battery electric vehicles, scrutinizing costs, subsidies, prices, and supply-chain arrangements.
Read caseEU inspections of Nuctech under the Foreign Subsidies Regulation show subsidy review moving into company premises, electronic records, and public procurement contexts.
Read caseThe U.S. UFLPA restricts Xinjiang-linked imports through a rebuttable presumption, keeping solar, polysilicon, and electronics supply chains in high-risk territory.
Read caseApparel, cotton, textiles, and e-commerce parcels are not exempt from forced-labour and origin proof merely because orders are small.
Read caseBrazilian prosecutors acted over allegations of slavery-like conditions and human trafficking involving construction workers, highlighting contractor-site risk abroad.
Read caseThe EU Forced Labour Regulation will allow authorities, from 2027, to ban products made with forced labour from being sold in or exported from the EU.
Read caseCBAM's definitive period makes carbon data for steel, aluminium, cement, and other products a customs and pricing variable.
Read caseThe CSDDD requires large companies to address human-rights and environmental impacts, with pressure passing to Chinese suppliers through contracts, questionnaires, and audits.
Read caseThe United States created prohibition and notification rules for certain China-related investments in semiconductors, quantum, and AI, expanding the technology-control toolkit.
Read caseThe U.S. Commerce Department tightened controls on advanced semiconductor manufacturing equipment, software tools, and Entity List designations to restrict China's advanced chip capacity.
Read caseU.S. licensing changes for AI chips designed for the China market show that a 'compliant product' is not a stable safe harbour.
Read caseDJI challenged its inclusion on the U.S. Defense Department's Chinese military companies list; even when not a sanctions list, it affects procurement, finance, insurance, customer confidence, and reputation.
Read caseLiDAR and smart-vehicle component firms facing security-list disputes show automotive supply chains being redefined by data, dual-use, and infrastructure narratives.
Read caseThe U.S. FCC placed several Chinese telecoms and surveillance companies on its national-security Covered List and restricted equipment authorizations.
Read caseThe UK FRAND dispute shows that SEP royalty rates, negotiation records, and global portfolio licensing are core risks for hardware exporters.
Read caseIndian enforcement action around Xiaomi India's overseas royalty payments and asset freezing shows local enforcement risk in fund flows and tax structures.
Read caseIndian enforcement actions involving Vivo-related entities show how sales networks, distributors, fund flows, and compliance records can enter a criminal-investigation frame.
Read caseU.S. FCPA enforcement policy shifted in 2025, but overseas anti-corruption risk remains multi-jurisdictional across the U.S., UK, France, World Bank, and host states.
Read caseThe U.S. FEPA adds criminal tools against foreign officials who solicit or receive bribes, potentially strengthening cross-border cooperation and evidence sharing.
Read caseChina's 2024 cross-border data rules eased some low-risk scenarios, but firms still need to classify personal information, important data, transfer mechanisms, and exemptions.
Read caseAfter the regulation took effect, network data processors face more concrete duties on classification, important data, personal information, and security management.
Read caseEV and battery expansion triggers counter-subsidy, carbon-data, critical-mineral, human-rights diligence, and product-safety requirements together.
Read caseChinese battery firms face overlapping U.S. security listings, supply-chain scrutiny, and procurement restrictions, affecting customer contracts and financing.
Read caseChinese companies using Mexico for North American access must prove substantial transformation, origin-rule compliance, and non-circumvention of trade remedies.
Read caseThe EU AI Act regulates AI systems by risk category, affecting Chinese AI, SaaS, connected devices, and platform services entering Europe.
Read caseWorld Bank and other MDB sanctions and cross-debarment mechanisms can turn one project violation into global procurement risk.
Read caseRed Sea security events caused rerouting, insurance, timing, and cost changes, showing political risk entering disputes through logistics contracts, delivery terms, and force majeure.
Read caseWhen firms use alternative currencies, offshore accounts, or third-country payment channels, sanctions, AML, tax, and beneficial-owner risks remain.
Read caseBIS placement of Huawei and affiliates on the Entity List reshaped semiconductor, software, equipment, and cloud-service supply chains through license requirements.
Read caseThe deferred prosecution agreement in the Meng Wanzhou case shows how sanctions-related representations and banking relationships can create personal criminal exposure.
Read caseThe UK required operators to stop buying new Huawei 5G equipment and remove existing gear by 2027, showing how allied sanctions can alter domestic security assessments.
Read caseGermany agreed with operators to remove Huawei and ZTE critical components from 5G core networks by 2026 and critical management systems by 2029.
Read caseZTE reached major settlements with DOJ, BIS, and OFAC over shipments of U.S.-origin items to restricted destinations using third-party arrangements.
Read caseBIS activated a denial order against ZTE, cutting access to U.S.-jurisdiction items, then terminated it after additional settlement terms, penalties, escrow, and compliance undertakings.
Read caseCanada first ordered TikTok's Canadian business wound up, then after further national security review permitted the investment to proceed subject to new legally binding undertakings.
Read caseAfter an FTC investigation, the DOJ sued TikTok and ByteDance alleging violations of COPPA and an existing order.
Read caseThe Commission made TikTok's commitment to permanently withdraw the TikTok Lite Rewards programme from the EU binding, highlighting DSA scrutiny of new features and addictive design.
Read caseThe European Commission fined Temu EUR 200 million for failing to properly identify, analyse, and assess systemic risks of illegal products on its platform.
Read caseThe Arkansas Attorney General sued Temu under state consumer and personal-information protection laws, showing how state enforcement can pressure platform compliance.
Read caseCPSC commissioners called for staff evaluation of how Shein, Temu, and similar foreign-owned platforms meet Consumer Product Safety Act obligations.
Read caseGoogle suspended the Google Play version of Pinduoduo over security concerns and used Play Protect against identified malicious versions, showing app-store rules can directly affect market access.
Read caseThe SEC charged Luckin with misleading investors by materially misstating revenue, expenses, and operating loss, resolving the case with a USD 180 million penalty.
Read caseAfter its U.S. listing, DiDi faced China's cybersecurity review and an RMB 8.026 billion penalty, then pursued NYSE delisting, showing the link between data regulation and overseas financing.
Read caseSAMR penalized Alibaba's platform exclusivity conduct, and Alibaba furnished the decision through SEC filings, linking domestic enforcement and global capital-market disclosure.
Read caseA U.S. executive order sought to restrict WeChat-related transactions, triggered user litigation and a preliminary injunction, and was later revoked.
Read caseA U.S. executive order sought to prohibit certain transactions involving Alipay, QQ Wallet, WeChat Pay, WPS, and other Chinese connected apps; it was revoked but left a data-security template.
Read caseThe U.S. Department of Defense included Tencent on the Section 1260H Chinese military companies list; although not a sanctions list, it can trigger investor, customer, and partner reassessment.
Read caseThe U.S. Treasury identified SenseTime as a Non-SDN Chinese Military-Industrial Complex company, citing surveillance technology and human-rights concerns that affect U.S. investor dealings.
Read caseCanada ordered Hikvision's Canadian business to cease operations and wind up under the Investment Canada Act national security framework, highlighting local-operation risk for security-equipment firms.
Read caseUnder the Secure Equipment Act framework, the FCC restricted new equipment authorizations for covered-list firms, affecting telecom, surveillance, and IoT product sales.
Read caseNo matching cases